Liam Markus. part 2
I've also wondered if DC girls were more likely to have "identity problems" rather than DC boys and interestingly enough I found an article on the net this afternoon that makes a reference to it for which you will find an exerpt bellow.
The article was written by
Dr. Vivienne Adair
Director, Centre for Child and family Policy Research
Senior Lecturer, School of Education
"Identities are forged by a combination of the past, present and the future and it is here that parents of children who have a conception using donor gametes have a special set of variables to contend with. As knowing oneself depends to some extent on knowing where one comes from, there may be different stresses and tasks to accomplish. It is always tempting to look to adoption as a comparison, but the situation has important differences. With assisted reproductive technology (ART) there is no ‘giving away’ of a child and donors have been encouraged to view gametes as ‘body parts’ by the donors, rather than as a prospective living child. The second difference is that semen and/or eggs have been produced specifically for recipient parents.
However, there are similarities for the child especially in the middle and late teenage years. The similarities are around the need for information about genetic background. For those teenagers who have a knowledge of the involvement of a donor in their conception, the interest in who they are seems to begin from about 13 years of age. Some want information about the donor at this stage and some want to meet him whether or not that is possible. There is not enough information to make definitive statements about this, but it appears that boys may be less likely to want to meet a donor than girls and that older more than younger teenagers want information. As well, it appears that acceptance of having no information or possible contact is dealt with differently. It would take an indepth study to determine which characteristics lead to acceptance and which do not, and at this point no such study has been undertaken."
http://www.aifs.gov.au/institute/afrc6papers/adair.html
1 Comments:
Lia -
To say that DD's initial reference to Liam's comments on the (radio?) show was a "cheap and nasty" move is illogical. DD as a potential DI Dad has a right to want to know if there are DC people out there who are happy in their life without being overtaken with the issues surrounding their conception. To make reference to one such person in comparison to the many instances that you refer to is legitamate and to say otherwise to devalue his thought processes and right to freedom of expression and speach.
Your comments to Liam that his views trivialize the pain of others surprise me as well. As I thought I read that he recognizes these are his own views and not perhaps the views of others. To say his statements trivialize others again devalues his worth and again unfair.
In each of these points you are twisting the presentation of these men's views to get out your own message and again that is not discussion it's someone yelling with the goal of obscuring another's freedom of speach.
- Eric
Post a Comment
<< Home